
My post tonight involves a different approach from my previous ones. I am looking into a 1896 Providence newspaper that I found being used as a shim underneath some floor-boards. As you can tell they look like they have been used as a shim, complete with hand-cut nail hole (you can tell because the hole is square).
At first I can't quite tell what the title of it is because it is ripped in two. "The Evenin..." The only paper that this could be is the "Providence Evening Post". The Evening Post ran from 1859-1972 which certainly puts this particular example in the right time (http://www.genealogybank.com/gbnk/newspapers/explore/USA/Rhode_Island/Providence/Providence_Evening_Press/) because I fell in love with this thing the first time I looked at it. On the front page is an account of "Nansen's Triumph" in his discovery of the North Pole, complete with a nah-sayer who objects based on a dearth of evidence. Some evidence of the "monster type" phenomenon is present in the ads and headlines.
I looked into trying to figure out what typefaces are used on this but I am running into some trouble. This is probably because of the "almost science" that typefaces were in this day. The current belief of this time was that "egyptian" slabs were optimal to use in body copy. But the body type is certainly not a slab serif. I started by looking at looked at four pretty obvious candidates for the font; Caslon, Times, Garamond, and Baskerville. But this led to a different place.
Caslon has the correct looking "g" with it's two-stories and closed bottom counter. The "g" also has a right feeling ear, it comes of at the correct angle and also terminates in the correct way. But here is where the similarities stop. One definitive trait of Caslon type is the "nib" quality that is evident in the sllightly slanted top serifs. This is a humanist typeface after all. The "A" also doesn't have the distinctive Caslon top. Caslon ultimately feels to humanist to be it.

I looked and Garamond and it proved to be a quick and easy. Garamond is way to humanist, compared to this typeface it looks closer to a renaissance script. So Garamond is out.
Times had the appropriate weight shifts but it had some big flaws to it though. The ear of the "g" is wrong, it comes off flat not angles. Also Times "e" has a distinctive offset counter within, and a large bottom lower counter with very thin finial.
I found Baskerville to be the most likely but it still doesn't feel right. The transitional typeface feels right but there are certain elements that don't quite fit. The "e" has a low crossbar compared to modern Baskerville, also the "R"'s leg is totally different, while Baskerville's is straight the font used in the newspaper is similar to "Bodoni." Aslo the "Q" doesn't have that beautiful swoosh of a Baskerville but again the "Q" resembles a Bodoni.
So this led me to Bodoni. Overall the type doesn't feel like a modern typeface like this, the contrast on thicks and thins are not as extreme, they are pretty comfortable. Maybe this is a hybrid typeface of sorts? The "W" doesn't have the double "v" to it like Bodoni. I was thinking of Didot but I decided that the typeface used isn't "fancy" enough.
I end this post with no definitive solution. The typeface used seems to be a hybrid between baskerville and Bodoni, a transistioning transition font. It is like find a missing link, a evolutionary hybrid between two different forms. This does seem correct to me. The world that this font existed in was in fact a transitional one. The victorian age was in between agricultural life and big business, man power or horse power and machine power, women's rights was staring to germinate, the ruminants of slavery was still being struggled with in the nation. This time period was in flux in many ways, technological, political, and psychologically.